HTTP/1.0 500 Buggy CGI Script Content-Type: text/html CGI-Script Error

CGI-Script Error

The CGI script you accessed is not working correctly. It didn't send any header data (possibly due to incorrect separation between the headers and the body). Please notify the author of the script of this problem.

Alpha WWW Message Board Comment: Boeing 737 Safety Questions

Boeing 737 Safety Questions

Message posted by T. D. Ponder (tdponder@juno.com) on Monday, January 06 at 05:24 PM MST

Message:

01/06/97 HOW SAFE IS THE WORLD'S MOST POPULAR AIRLINER? From: T. D. Ponder Airline Transport Pilot (10,000+ Hours PIC) Birmingham, AL The FAA has just issued an A.D. (Airworthiness Directive) for Boeing 737 aircraft that incredibly does not offer to solve KNOWN problems with the aircraft's Rudder Power Control Unit, but instead mandates crew training so pilots can attempt to survive sudden control problems. NTSB investigators remain unsure why two Boeing 737s crashed, one near Pittsburgh and the other in Colorado, although rudder problems definitely are suspected. The 737 is the most popular airliner today with 2,705 flying world wide, including 1,115 in the U.S. The FAA mandate requires Flight Manual changes and crew training to instruct pilots how to correct jammed or restricted flight controls. That's right. The FAA has said that test by Boeing showed the 737's Rudder Power Control Unit under extreme conditions could jam and even go in the opposite direction desired. Imagine the fun of THAT on a gusty landing! I certainly would call a rudder movement in a direction opposite from input an extreme condition at time or altitude. Is training to overcome a mechanical uncertainty a viable solution for one of the worst conditions a pilot could ever face? The FAA goes on to suggest a pilot lower the nose in such a situation to increase airspeed and regain control of the aircraft. The FAA does NOT clarify, to my knowledge, if this procedure is to be used only at altitude or maybe at Decision Height on an ILS night IMC approach. Only a fool would do such a thing to an aircraft already out of control due to Rudder Hardover (sudden rudder movement) mere feet above a runway. What? Just slam her down, split the gear, and maybe walk away saying that is what I was told to do? The pilots who fly 737s, the Boeing Co., and the FAA have known about these problems for years. A fellow flight Instructor I gave instruction to in aerobatics subsequently was hired by Piedmont, now US Air, of course, and he told me in the early 1970's that the 737 would get into a "Roll Oscillation" condition on approaches under gusty or turbulent conditions. He said the plane would then have to be flow manually, with locked elbows to force the yoke steady, until the aircraft stabilized. Other pilots have told friends of unexpected and sudden Rudder Hardover at altitude and said they did not think they would have recovered had they been on approach. There was no indication of problems from the crews involved in the two approach crashes, so you know it happened suddenly and that it was unrecoverable. The FAA apparently is making no attempt to solve the mechanics of the problem, but instead imposing upon crew members the edit to break its own rules namely those rules that require, in terms of aircraft and airman certification, that no unusual or extraordinary piloting techniques or abilities be required. This A.D. presents a ludicrous position unworthy of the FAA. Additionally, a standby procedure is mandated that requires the switching off of the rudder's hydraulic assist system under prolonged conditions and executing approach and landings manually. Let's hope the lady pilots type rated in 737s have had their Wheaties before preflight. It is my opinion that there still exist the potential for disaster until the actual problem is solved. Components should be redesigned, if necessary. The resolution of this problem belongs to Boeing, the FAA, and the Air Carriers -- certainly not to the pilots in the cockpit where it is just a little too late for engineering, or attempts at aerobatics on short final with a plane full of paying passengers. I have sent Email to the NTSB, the FAA, and most US Senators concerning this critical problem. If you feel there is merit to this discussion, please at least contact your Senators and recommend another. closer look at the situation. On the Internet, go to: http://www.senate.gov/senator/state.html where you will find a list of US Senators, by state, with links to their Email addresses in Washington. If you have flow or are currently flying 737's and have experienced critical problems of this nature, please send me Email with a brief summary, signed preferably, or anonymously if necessary. I shall forward the information to your Senators and other appropriate sources. Please state if you are currently flying a 737 and its model number and the approximate date, location, and flight conditions during the occurrence. Send Email to: T. D. Ponder tdponder@juno.com This situation needs to be resolved immediately before the possibility of lives being unnecessarily lost becomes a reality. ###.


Follow-Up Postings:


* Back to the Main Alpha WWW Message Board